Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT

AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8600 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
3552 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT 's Advantages
Lower TDP (47W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V320 +14044%
10.75 TFLOPS
GeForce 8600 GT
0.076 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Apr 2007
Radeon Pro Vega
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

852 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
945 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
2048bit
Memory Bus
128bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
3584
Shading Units
32
224
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.640 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
76.16 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

230W
TDP
47W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
G84
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
GPU Variant
G84-303-A2
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Tesla
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
80 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy