Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs NVIDIA NVS 510

AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs NVIDIA NVS 510

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 and 2GB VRAM NVS 510 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
3392 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V320 +3413%
10.75 TFLOPS
NVS 510
0.306 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Oct 2012
Radeon Pro Vega
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

852 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
945 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR3
2048bit
Memory Bus
128bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
192
224
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.188 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.75 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
306.0 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
12.75 GFLOPS

Board Design

230W
TDP
35W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
GK107
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Kepler
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy