Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 550

AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 550

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 and 128MB VRAM Quadro FX 550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 550 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 230W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Apr 2006
Radeon Pro Vega
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

852 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
945 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
128MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
2048bit
Memory Bus
128bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
56
Compute Units
-
3584
Shading Units
-
224
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.440 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.880 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
NV43
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
GPU Variant
NV43 GL
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Curie
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
110 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.146 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
154 mm²

Board Design

230W
TDP
30W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy