Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300

AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro 5300 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 10% (1650MHz vs 1500MHz)
Lower TDP (85W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V320 +154%
10.75 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5300
4.224 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Aug 2020
Radeon Pro Vega
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

852 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
945 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6
2048bit
Memory Bus
128bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
1280
224
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.0 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.448 TFLOPS
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.224 TFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
264.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

230W
TDP
85W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
Navi 14
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XE
GCN 5.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
7 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy