Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs ATI FireGL V5600

AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs ATI FireGL V5600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 and 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
3464 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V5600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (89W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V320 +5498%
10.75 TFLOPS
FireGL V5600
0.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Aug 2007
Radeon Pro Vega
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

852 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
945 MHz
Memory Clock
1100 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR4
2048bit
Memory Bus
128bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
35.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
56
Compute Units
3
3584
Shading Units
120
224
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.400 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
RV630
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
GCN 5.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
65 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Board Design

230W
TDP
89W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy