Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V620 vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

AMD Radeon Pro V620 vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro V620 and 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V620 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 33% (2200MHz vs 1650MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (185W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V620 +166%
20.28 TFLOPS
CMP 40HX
7.603 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Feb 2021
Radeon Pro
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
1470 MHz
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
36
72
Compute Units
-
4608
Shading Units
2304
288
TMUs
144
128
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
72
RT Cores
36
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

281.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.6 GPixel/s
633.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
237.6 GTexel/s
40.55 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
15.21 TFLOPS
20.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.603 TFLOPS
1267 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
237.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
TU106
Navi 21 XT (215-121000177)
GPU Variant
TU106-100-A1
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
12 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
185W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy