Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V620 vs ATI FirePro V4900

AMD Radeon Pro V620 vs ATI FirePro V4900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro V620 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V620 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
4128 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V620 +2540%
20.28 TFLOPS
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Nov 2011
Radeon Pro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

72
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
4608
Shading Units
480
288
TMUs
24
128
ROPs
8
-
-
-
72
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

281.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
633.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
40.55 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
20.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
1267 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
75W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
Turks
Navi 21 XT (215-121000177)
GPU Variant
Turks XT GL
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy