Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V7300X vs AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro V7300X vs AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V7300X and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 360 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V7300X 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 18% (1243MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (85W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V7300X +255%
5.728 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 360 OEM
1.613 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
May 2015
Radeon Pro
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1188 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1243 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
104.0GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
768
144
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.80 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
85W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
Tobago
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy