Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 16 and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX330 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (307.2GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 34% (1594MHz vs 1190MHz)
Lower TDP (10W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Vega 16 +99%
2.437 TFLOPS
GeForce MX330
1.224 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2018
Release Date
Feb 2020
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

815 MHz
Base Clock
1531 MHz
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
1594 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
1024bit
Memory Bus
64bit
307.2GB/s
Bandwidth
56.06GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.50 GPixel/s
76.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.26 GTexel/s
4.874 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
19.13 GFLOPS
2.437 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1224 GFLOPS
152.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
38.26 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 12
GPU Name
GP108
Vega 12 XLA
GPU Variant
GP108-655-A1 (N17S-G3-A1)
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Pascal
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
Samsung
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.3
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy