Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs AMD Radeon R7 M260

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs AMD Radeon R7 M260

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 64 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 M260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 38% (1350MHz vs 980MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (402.4GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Vega 64 +1370%
11.06 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 M260
0.752 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Jun 2014
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1250 MHz
Base Clock
940 MHz
1350 MHz
Boost Clock
980 MHz
786 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR3
2048bit
Memory Bus
64bit
402.4GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
384
256
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.840 GPixel/s
345.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.52 GTexel/s
22.12 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
752.6 GFLOPS
11.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
752.6 GFLOPS
691.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
Topaz
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
Topaz XT (216-0858020)
GCN 5.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy