Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Vega II vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285

AMD Radeon Pro Vega II vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega II and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Vega II 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1720MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (825.3GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
3856 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 475W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Vega II +1890%
14.09 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285
0.708 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2019
Release Date
Dec 2008
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
Apple MPX
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1574 MHz
Base Clock
-
1720 MHz
Boost Clock
-
806 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
512bit
825.3GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
4096
Shading Units
240
256
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

110.1 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
440.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
28.18 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.09 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
7.045 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

475W
TDP
204W
850 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Vega 20
GPU Name
GT200B
Vega 20 XT
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy