Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Vega II vs AMD Radeon R9 285

AMD Radeon Pro Vega II vs AMD Radeon R9 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega II and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Vega II 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1720MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (825.3GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Lower TDP (190W vs 475W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Vega II +328%
14.09 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 285
3.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2019
Release Date
Sep 2014
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
Apple MPX
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1574 MHz
Base Clock
-
1720 MHz
Boost Clock
-
806 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
825.3GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
28
4096
Shading Units
1792
256
TMUs
112
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

110.1 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.38 GPixel/s
440.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.8 GTexel/s
28.18 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.290 TFLOPS
14.09 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.290 TFLOPS
7.045 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
205.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Vega 20
GPU Name
Tonga
Vega 20 XT
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GCN 5.1
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
5 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Board Design

475W
TDP
190W
850 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy