Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5500 and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W5500 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1855MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 125W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2020
Release Date
Jan 2008
Radeon Pro
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

1744 MHz
Base Clock
-
1855 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
22
Compute Units
-
1408
Shading Units
-
88
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

59.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
163.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
10.45 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.224 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
326.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 14
GPU Name
RV380
Navi 14 PRO XL
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
130 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Board Design

125W
TDP
20W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy