Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs AMD Radeon R9 280

AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs AMD Radeon R9 280

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5500 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W5500 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 99% (1855MHz vs 933MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (125W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W5500 +56%
5.224 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280
3.344 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2020
Release Date
Mar 2014
Radeon Pro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1744 MHz
Base Clock
827 MHz
1855 MHz
Boost Clock
933 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

22
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
1408
Shading Units
1792
88
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.86 GPixel/s
163.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.5 GTexel/s
10.45 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.224 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.344 TFLOPS
326.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
836.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

125W
TDP
200W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 14
GPU Name
Tahiti
Navi 14 PRO XL
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy