Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W5700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

AMD Radeon Pro W5700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5700 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W5700 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1880MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2088 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 205W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W5700 +1516%
8.663 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Sep 2008
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1400 MHz
Base Clock
-
1880 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
2304
Shading Units
216
144
TMUs
72
64
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

120.3 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
270.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
17.33 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.663 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
541.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

205W
TDP
182W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
5x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 10
GPU Name
GT200
-
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
65 nm
10.3 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
251 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy