Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 and 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 14% (2040MHz vs 1785MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 125W)
NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W6300
3.133 TFLOPS
CMP 30HX +60%
5.027 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Feb 2021
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1512 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
32bit
Memory Bus
192bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
768
Shading Units
1408
48
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

65.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
97.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
6.267 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
3.133 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
195.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
125W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
TU116
Navi 24
GPU Variant
TU116-100-A1
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy