Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs AMD FirePro W2100

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs AMD FirePro W2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 200% (2040MHz vs 680MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 26W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W6300 +620%
3.133 TFLOPS
FirePro W2100
0.435 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Aug 2014
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1512 MHz
Base Clock
630 MHz
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
680 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
32bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

65.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.440 GPixel/s
97.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
6.267 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.133 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
435.2 GFLOPS
195.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
27.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
26W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
Oland
Navi 24
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy