Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 94% (2040MHz vs 1050MHz)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W6300 +288%
3.133 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 350 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
May 2015
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1512 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
32bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

65.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
97.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
6.267 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.133 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
195.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
Oland
Navi 24
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy