Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
Lower TDP (25W vs 290W)
AMD Radeon R9 290X 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W6300
3.133 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290X +79%
5.632 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Oct 2013
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1512 MHz
Base Clock
-
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
32bit
Memory Bus
512bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2816
48
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

65.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
97.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
176.0 GTexel/s
6.267 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.133 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.632 TFLOPS
195.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
704.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
290W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
Hawaii
Navi 24
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy