Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 12.48GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 41W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Oct 2007
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Radeon R500 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

1512 MHz
Base Clock
-
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
390 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
32bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
12.48GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
-
48
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

65.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
97.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
6.267 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.133 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
195.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
RV530
Navi 24
GPU Variant
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
90 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
41W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
Floppy

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy