Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6300M vs AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition

AMD Radeon Pro W6300M vs AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6300M and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6300M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 109% (2040MHz vs 975MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 80W)
AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6300M +56%
3.133 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition
1.997 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Nov 2014
Radeon Pro Mobile
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1512 MHz
Base Clock
850 MHz
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
975 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
32bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

65.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
97.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
62.40 GTexel/s
6.267 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.133 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.997 TFLOPS
195.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Navi 24
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy