AMD Radeon Pro W6300M vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6300M and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro W6300M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 21% (2040MHz vs 1680MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 120W)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
8960 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6300M
3.133 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
+943%
32.69 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Mar 2023
Radeon Pro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1512 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
32bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
76
768
Shading Units
9728
48
TMUs
304
32
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
12
RT Cores
76
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
65.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
97.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
6.267 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
3.133 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
195.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
120W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Navi 24
GPU Name
AD103
Navi 24
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
5 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.7
Shader Model
6.8
