Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 and 64MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock2331MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 6.496GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 50W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jan 2008
Radeon Pro
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz
Base Clock
-
2331 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
203 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
64MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.496GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
-
48
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

74.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.000 GPixel/s
111.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.000 GTexel/s
7.161 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.580 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
223.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
RV380
Navi 24 XL-W
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
130 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
2.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy