Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD FirePro RG220A

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD FirePro RG220A

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
688 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6400 +4375%
3.58 TFLOPS
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
May 2010
Radeon Pro
Generation
FirePro Remote
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz
Base Clock
-
2331 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
80
48
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

74.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
111.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
7.161 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.580 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
223.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
M93
Navi 24 XL-W
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy