Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs ATI FirePro V5800

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs ATI FirePro V5800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V5800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
Lower TDP (50W vs 74W)
ATI FirePro V5800 's Advantages
32 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6400 +224%
3.58 TFLOPS
FirePro V5800
1.104 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Apr 2010
Radeon Pro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz
Base Clock
-
2331 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
800
48
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

74.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.04 GPixel/s
111.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
27.60 GTexel/s
7.161 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.580 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1104 GFLOPS
223.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
74W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
Juniper
Navi 24 XL-W
GPU Variant
Juniper XT GL
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
1.04 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
166 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy