Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD FireStream 9270

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD FireStream 9270

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 160W)
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
32 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6400 +198%
3.58 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Nov 2008
Radeon Pro
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz
Base Clock
-
2331 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
800
48
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

74.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
111.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
7.161 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.580 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
223.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
160W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
RV770
Navi 24 XL-W
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy