Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 520 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
720 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (29W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6400 +2551%
3.58 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 520 OEM
0.135 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Aug 2012
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz
Base Clock
-
2331 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
768
Shading Units
48
48
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

74.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
111.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
7.161 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.580 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
134.6 GFLOPS
223.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
11.22 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
29W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
GF119
Navi 24 XL-W
GPU Variant
GF119 B1
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy