Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs Intel H3C XG310

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs Intel H3C XG310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 50% (2331MHz vs 1550MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6400 +50%
3.58 TFLOPS
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Nov 2020
Radeon Pro
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
2331 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
768
48
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

74.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
111.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
7.161 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
3.580 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
223.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
DG1
Navi 24 XL-W
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
6 nm
Process Size
10 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
Unknown
107 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy