Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Boost Clock2331MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 375W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (134.4GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6400 +232%
3.58 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
1.078 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz
Base Clock
-
2331 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
134.4GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
768
Shading Units
512
48
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

74.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.86 GPixel/s
111.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.73 GTexel/s
7.161 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.580 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1078 GFLOPS
223.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
375W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
GF100
Navi 24 XL-W
GPU Variant
GF100-ES-DT1-A2
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy