Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 GM206 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 88% (2331MHz vs 1239MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 60W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6400 +182%
3.58 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 750 GM206
1.269 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Nov 2015
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz
Base Clock
1087 MHz
2331 MHz
Boost Clock
1239 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
512
48
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

74.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.65 GPixel/s
111.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.65 GTexel/s
7.161 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.580 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1269 GFLOPS
223.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
39.65 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
60W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
GM206
Navi 24 XL-W
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy