AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER

VS

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages

Released 2 years and 6 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 32% (2331MHz vs 1770MHz)

Lower TDP (50W vs 215W)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 's Advantages

More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)

1792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Radeon Pro W6400

3.58 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER +153%

9.062 TFLOPS

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Radeon Pro W6400

8

GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER +425%

42

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Radeon Pro W6400

20

GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER +300%

80

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Radeon Pro W6400

35

GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER +237%

118

Radeon Pro W6400

VS

GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER

Graphics Card

Jan 2022

Release Date

Jul 2019

Radeon Pro

Generation

GeForce 20

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 4.0 x4

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz

Base Clock

1605 MHz

2331 MHz

Boost Clock

1770 MHz

1750 MHz

Memory Clock

1750 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

8GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR6

64bit

Memory Bus

256bit

112.0GB/s

Bandwidth

448.0GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

40

12

Compute Units

-

768

Shading Units

2560

48

TMUs

160

32

ROPs

64

-

Tensor Cores

320

12

RT Cores

40

128 KB per Array

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

1024 KB

L2 Cache

4 MB

Theoretical Performance

74.59 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

113.3 GPixel/s

111.9 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

283.2 GTexel/s

7.161 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

18.12 TFLOPS

3.580 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

9.062 TFLOPS

223.8 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

283.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 24

GPU Name

TU104

Navi 24 XL-W

GPU Variant

TU104-410-A1

RDNA 2.0

Architecture

Turing

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

6 nm

Process Size

12 nm

5.4 billion

Transistors

13.6 billion

107 mm²

Die Size

545 mm²

Board Design

50W

TDP

215W

250 W

Suggested PSU

550 W

2x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C

None

Power Connectors

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

2.2

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

7.5

6.6

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA T1000 8 GB

2

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD Radeon RX 6400

3

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB

4

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060

5

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

6

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary

7

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

8

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs Intel Arc Pro A50

9

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2

10

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD Radeon HD 7670 OEM

Related News

1

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

2

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

3

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

4

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

5

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

6

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

7

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance

8

Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports

9

Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip

10

AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly