AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB

VS

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages

Lower TDP (50W vs 165W)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 's Advantages

Released 1 years and 4 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 9% (2535MHz vs 2331MHz)

More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)

3584 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Radeon Pro W6400

3.58 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB +516%

22.06 TFLOPS

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Radeon Pro W6400

8

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB +625%

58

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Radeon Pro W6400

20

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB +490%

118

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Radeon Pro W6400

35

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB +477%

202

Radeon Pro W6400

VS

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB

Graphics Card

Jan 2022

Release Date

May 2023

Radeon Pro

Generation

GeForce 40

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 4.0 x4

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz

Base Clock

2310 MHz

2331 MHz

Boost Clock

2535 MHz

1750 MHz

Memory Clock

2250 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

16GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR6

64bit

Memory Bus

128bit

112.0GB/s

Bandwidth

288.0GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

34

12

Compute Units

-

768

Shading Units

4352

48

TMUs

136

32

ROPs

48

-

Tensor Cores

136

12

RT Cores

34

128 KB per Array

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

1024 KB

L2 Cache

32 MB

Theoretical Performance

74.59 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

121.7 GPixel/s

111.9 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

344.8 GTexel/s

7.161 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

22.06 TFLOPS

3.580 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

22.06 TFLOPS

223.8 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

344.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 24

GPU Name

AD106

Navi 24 XL-W

GPU Variant

AD106-351-A1

RDNA 2.0

Architecture

Ada Lovelace

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

6 nm

Process Size

5 nm

5.4 billion

Transistors

22.9 billion

107 mm²

Die Size

188 mm²

Board Design

50W

TDP

165W

250 W

Suggested PSU

450 W

2x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

None

Power Connectors

1x 16-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

2.2

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

8.9

6.6

Shader Model

6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

1

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA T1000 8 GB

2

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD Radeon RX 6400

3

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060

4

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB

5

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

6

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary

7

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

8

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460

9

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs ATI Radeon X1700 SE

10

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD Radeon RX 5500 OEM

Related News

1

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

2

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

3

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

4

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

5

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

6

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance

7

Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports

8

Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip

9

AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly

10

NVIDIA to Ramp Up Orders and Add New Suppliers to Meet Explosive Demand for Blackwell Products