Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 AGP

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 3850 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock2331MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 52.99GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6400 +736%
3.58 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 3850 AGP
0.428 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jan 2008
Radeon Pro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz
Base Clock
-
2331 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
828 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
52.99GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

74.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.69 GPixel/s
111.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.69 GTexel/s
7.161 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.580 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
427.5 GFLOPS
223.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
85.50 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
RV670
Navi 24 XL-W
GPU Variant
RV670 PRO (215-0708003)
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
2.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy