Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD Radeon R7 260X

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD Radeon R7 260X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 260X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (50W vs 115W)
AMD Radeon R7 260X 's Advantages
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6400 +81%
3.58 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 260X
1.971 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Oct 2013
Radeon Pro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz
Base Clock
-
2331 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
104.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
14
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
896
48
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

74.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
111.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
7.161 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.580 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
223.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
115W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
Bonaire
Navi 24 XL-W
GPU Variant
Bonaire XTX (215-0839097)
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy