Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6500M vs AMD FirePro M3900

AMD Radeon Pro W6500M vs AMD FirePro M3900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6500M and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6500M 's Advantages
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
864 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 25W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6500M +1640%
4.178 TFLOPS
FirePro M3900
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2010
Radeon Pro Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1512 MHz
Base Clock
-
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
160
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

65.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
130.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
8.356 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.178 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
261.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

25W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
Seymour
Navi 24
GPU Variant
Seymour GL
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy