Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6600 vs AMD FirePro W9000

AMD Radeon Pro W6600 vs AMD FirePro W9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6600 and 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6600 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock2580MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Lower TDP (100W vs 274W)
AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6600 +131%
9.247 TFLOPS
FirePro W9000
3.994 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Jun 2012
Radeon Pro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz
Base Clock
-
2580 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
2048
112
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
28
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
32 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

165.1 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
289.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
18.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.247 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
577.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
274W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 23
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.06 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
237 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy