Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6600 vs AMD FireStream 9170

AMD Radeon Pro W6600 vs AMD FireStream 9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6600 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6600 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2580MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 105W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6600 +1760%
9.247 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Nov 2007
Radeon Pro
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz
Base Clock
-
2580 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
320
112
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
28
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
32 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

165.1 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
289.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
18.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.247 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
577.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
105W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 23
GPU Name
RV670
-
-
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
11.06 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
237 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy