Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6600 vs AMD Radeon R7 240

AMD Radeon Pro W6600 vs AMD Radeon R7 240

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6600 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6600 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 231% (2580MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6600 +1753%
9.247 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Oct 2013
Radeon Pro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz
Base Clock
730 MHz
2580 MHz
Boost Clock
780 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
320
112
TMUs
20
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
28
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
32 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

165.1 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
289.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
18.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.247 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
577.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

100W
TDP
30W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 23
GPU Name
Oland
-
GPU Variant
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.06 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
237 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy