Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210

AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800 and 16GB VRAM CMP 100HX 210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6800 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 102% (2320MHz vs 1147MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6800 +51%
17.82 TFLOPS
CMP 100HX 210
11.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Jan 2020
Radeon Pro
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2075 MHz
Base Clock
555 MHz
2320 MHz
Boost Clock
1147 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
810 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
829.4GB/s

Render Config

60
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
80
3840
Shading Units
5120
240
TMUs
320
96
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
96 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

222.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
146.8 GPixel/s
556.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
367.0 GTexel/s
35.64 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
23.49 TFLOPS
17.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.75 TFLOPS
1114 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.873 TFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
GV100
-
-
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
12 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.0
6.5
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy