Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs AMD FirePro W4100

AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs AMD FirePro W4100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6800 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2320MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6800 +2662%
17.82 TFLOPS
FirePro W4100
0.645 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Aug 2014
Radeon Pro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2075 MHz
Base Clock
-
2320 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

60
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
3840
Shading Units
512
240
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
-
-
-
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

222.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.08 GPixel/s
556.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.16 GTexel/s
35.64 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
645.1 GFLOPS
1114 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.32 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
Cape Verde
-
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy