Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6800X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250

AMD Radeon Pro W6800X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800X and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6800X 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2087MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6800X +4042%
16.03 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Mar 2009
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
Apple MPX
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1800 MHz
Base Clock
-
2087 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

60
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
3840
Shading Units
128
240
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
16
-
-
-
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

200.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.23 GPixel/s
500.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.93 GTexel/s
32.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.03 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
387.1 GFLOPS
1002 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

200W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
2x DVI
Apple MPX
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
G92B
Navi 21 Pro-XLA
GPU Variant
G92-428-B1
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy