Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs ATI FireGL V3600

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs ATI FireGL V3600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X and 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2150MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
5000 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6900X +15191%
22.02 TFLOPS
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Jun 2007
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2150 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
5120
Shading Units
120
320
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
4
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

275.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
688.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
44.03 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
1376 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
73W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
RV630
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
65 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy