Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2150MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
5104 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6900X +56361%
22.02 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Apr 2007
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2150 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
80
Compute Units
-
5120
Shading Units
16
320
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

275.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
688.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
44.03 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
1376 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
GT218
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
40W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.5
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy