Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs ATI FirePro V8700

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs ATI FirePro V8700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2150MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 108.8GB/s)
4320 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V8700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (151W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6900X +1735%
22.02 TFLOPS
FirePro V8700
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Sep 2008
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2150 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
108.8GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
5120
Shading Units
800
320
TMUs
40
128
ROPs
16
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

275.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
688.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
44.03 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
1376 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
151W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
RV770
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
GPU Variant
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy