Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs AMD FirePro W8100

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs AMD FirePro W8100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X and 8GB VRAM FirePro W8100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2150MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W8100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (220W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6900X +421%
22.02 TFLOPS
FirePro W8100
4.219 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Jun 2014
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2150 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
40
-
-
-
5120
Shading Units
2560
320
TMUs
160
128
ROPs
64
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

275.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.74 GPixel/s
688.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
131.8 GTexel/s
44.03 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.219 TFLOPS
1376 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.109 TFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
220W
700 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
Hawaii
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL40
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy