Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2150MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
5104 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6900X +62814%
22.02 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Oct 2009
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2150 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
5120
Shading Units
16
320
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
4
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

275.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.900 GPixel/s
688.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.800 GTexel/s
44.03 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
1376 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
31W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
GT216
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.5
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy