Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2150MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 141.7GB/s)
4880 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 's Advantages
Lower TDP (236W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6900X +3440%
22.02 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 280
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Jun 2008
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2150 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1107 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
141.7GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
5120
Shading Units
240
320
TMUs
80
128
ROPs
32
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

275.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.26 GPixel/s
688.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.16 GTexel/s
44.03 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
1376 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
236W
700 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
GT200
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
GPU Variant
G200-300-A2
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
65 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy