Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X and 256MB VRAM Radeon X800 GTO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2150MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 31.36GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 300W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Nov 2007
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Radeon R400 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2150 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
490 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
31.36GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
5120
Shading Units
-
320
TMUs
12
128
ROPs
12
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

275.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
688.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
44.03 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
1376 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
49W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x Molex

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
R420
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
GPU Variant
R420 GTO
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
R400
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
130 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.16 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
281 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0b (9_2)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy