Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2150MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
5056 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6900X +13662%
22.02 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
0.16 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Jan 2008
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2150 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
5120
Shading Units
64
320
TMUs
32
128
ROPs
16
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

275.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
688.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
44.03 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
160.0 GFLOPS
1376 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
105W
700 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
G92
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
65 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy