Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 17% (2505MHz vs 2150MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 32GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
13056 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6900X
22.02 TFLOPS
RTX 6000 Ada +313%
91.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Dec 2022
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
915 MHz
2150 MHz
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
142
5120
Shading Units
18176
320
TMUs
568
128
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
80
RT Cores
142
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
96 MB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

275.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
688.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
44.03 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
22.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
1376 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
300W
700 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
AD102
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
GPU Variant
AD102
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
5 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy